[reSIProcate] A couple more minor issues from torture-tests

[Robert Sparks]

No, you're right - 416 talks about the RURI. You're choice of 400 is  
the best we have at hand.

RjS

On Aug 8, 2006, at 10:43 AM, Byron Campen wrote:

> 	Is 416 an appropriate response for an unsupported scheme in a To  
> header as opposed to the Request-Uri?
>
> Best regards,
> Byron Campen
>
>>
>> On Aug 8, 2006, at 10:18 AM, Byron Campen wrote:
>>
>>> 1. Currently ServerRegistration succeeds when the aor has a  
>>> scheme other than sip or sips. This is a pretty easy fix (in  
>>> ServerRegistration::dispatch, we check the scheme, and send a 400  
>>> if it isn't correct).
>> 416?
>>
>>>
>>> 2. Currently, the authentication functions in Helper do not check  
>>> whether the authentication scheme is "Digest" (they assume that  
>>> "Digest" is being used without verifying whether this is true).  
>>> This is also easily fixed.
>>>
>>> Unless anyone has objections, I will be applying fixes for these  
>>> to the main trunk.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Byron Campen_______________________________________________
>>> resiprocate-devel mailing list
>>> resiprocate-devel at list.sipfoundry.org
>>> https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
>>
>