[reSIProcate] New resip release

Jason Fischl jason at counterpath.com
Thu Aug 3 15:43:12 CDT 2006


On 8/3/06, Alan Hawrylyshen <alan at polyphase.ca> wrote:
>
> On 2006.08.01, at 14:11 , Jason Fischl wrote:
>
> > My recommendation is that this time around, that we just provide a
> > release number and/or tag associated with the release candidate rather
> > than providing a tarball.  Once we are ready to do the actual release,
> > we can generate the tarball. I think this will lower the bar on
> > getting new releases out.
> >
> > Jason
> >
>
> Agreed, however there is some concern around what goes INTO the
> tarball, and there will be non-zero time needed to debug the tarball
> itself.
>

I found that our decision to strip lots of stuff out of the tarball
last time was a mistake. I think we should leave most stuff in and
reduce the effort to produce the tarball instead. My guess is that
more frequent releases would be preferred.



More information about the resiprocate-devel mailing list