[reSIProcate] resiprocate performance, DUM and Presence server : Questions

[Scott Godin]

You should use DUM.  There are some examples in the dum/test directory
and some documentation on the wiki.

 

Scott

 

From: resiprocate-devel-bounces at list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:resiprocate-devel-bounces at list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of
Vishal K. Singh
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 9:25 AM
To: resiprocate-devel at list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: [reSIProcate] resiprocate performance,DUM and Presence server :
Questions

 

Hello,

Is there some performance measurements done for resiprocate sip stack,
if yes, can you send me a pointer to the results. ?

For implementing a presence agent:

Is it better to use the SipStack interface i.e, use stack->receive() and
write a dialog layer i.e.,create a SIPDialog object which provides
callbacks like OnSubscribeMessage(), based on the received message or
should I use DUM ? 

I have not yet completely figured out DUM, but,  I think some of this
may be already taken care of by the DUM. I saw code and API for
specifying handlers, But, could not yet find where is the logic
implemented which specifies which handlers to be invoked when? In other
words, how do I specify which handler to be invoked when a SUBSCRIBE or
NOTIFY is received. The different handlers are specified to DUM (using
functions like addSubscriptionClientHandler etc.) and I assume they will
be automatically invoked, but, where is the logic which let me specify
which handlers to be executed under different conditions or messages. 

Is there a document or are there code examples in repository  to build
new applications like presence agent using DUM. This would be really
helpful to understand the DUM design and usage. 

Thanks a lot for your time. 

Regards, 
Vishal 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.resiprocate.org/pipermail/resiprocate-devel/attachments/20060711/1a1ce3b0/attachment.htm>