[reSIProcate] To DUM or not to DUM

[Craig Scott]

Thanks for that Jason. Is DUMv2 evolution of revolution - should I wait
for v2?

Thanks

Craig

-----Original Message-----
From: jason.fischl at gmail.com [mailto:jason.fischl at gmail.com] On Behalf
Of Jason Fischl
Sent: 30 May 2006 17:18
To: Craig Scott
Cc: resiprocate-devel at list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: Re: [reSIProcate] To DUM or not to DUM

dum is appropriate for any user agent application and is highly
recommended. It will be supported going forward although we are having
a coding session this coming weekend to work on a dumv2.

On 5/30/06, Craig Scott <Craig.Scott at telephonetics.co.uk> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> Can anyone point me (a resip newbie) to any information regarding when
to
> use DUM (and when not to) Is there anything significant in terms of
> functionality or scalability that I will not be able to do if I use
the DUM
> (I'm thinking B2BUA, Voicemail and call routing apps - autoattendants
etc.)
> Is DUM something that will be 'supported' going forward?
>
>
>
> Thanks for any pointers.
>
>
>
> Regards
>
>
>
> Craig
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> resiprocate-devel mailing list
> resiprocate-devel at list.sipfoundry.org
> https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
>
>