[reSIProcate] DUM version 2 work session

Matt Porter mporter at calltower.com
Wed Apr 19 13:34:08 CDT 2006


I for one, would like to include support for the implied subscription
models used by cisco for DTMF/KPML/MWI without modifying the core DUM.

Apparently no one else does though, as my previous thread about it got
no response.

-----Original Message-----
From: resiprocate-devel-bounces at list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:resiprocate-devel-bounces at list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of
Jason Fischl
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 7:03 PM
To: Hong Yu
Cc: resiprocate-devel
Subject: Re: [reSIProcate] DUM version 2 work session

On 4/19/06, Hong Yu <hyu at metreos.com> wrote:
> One thing I'd like to see addressed is a better way of managing 
> Transports, for example, removing of a transport at runtime. Also, 
> fuller support of SUBSCRIBE/NOTIFY is definitely needed.
>
Can you be more explicit on what you mean by fuller support of
SUB/NOTIFY?
_______________________________________________
resiprocate-devel mailing list
resiprocate-devel at list.sipfoundry.org
https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel



More information about the resiprocate-devel mailing list