[reSIProcate] DumThread
hanan aboudalal
hanan.aboudalal at gmail.com
Mon Apr 10 15:57:42 CDT 2006
This is the same code that is used in BasicCall.cxx file. You can see that
UAC and UAS both belong to the same thread and this is not the case in
practical application. There should be a way to use DUM where UAS and UAC
are two different excecutables (threads). Please any one have the answer?
On 4/10/06, Suresh Rangaswamy <suresh at aylus.com> wrote:
>
> Hi All
>
> I have the same question and how does this compare against the code
> snippet in the documentation.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> while (!dumShutDown)
>
> {
>
> FdSet fdset;
>
> stack->buildFdSet(fdset);
>
> int err = fdset.selectMilliSeconds
> (stack->getTimeTillNextProcessMS());
>
> assert ( err != -1 );
>
> stack->process(fdset);
>
> while(dumUas->process());
>
> }
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Suresh
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *From:* resiprocate-devel-bounces at list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:
> resiprocate-devel-bounces at list.sipfoundry.org]
> *Sent:* Monday, April 10, 2006 3:27 PM
> *To:* resiprocate-devel at list.sipfoundry.org
> *Subject:* [reSIProcate] DumThread
>
>
>
> Hi all:
>
>
>
> What is the role of *resip::**DumThread* and *resip::StackThread?* How
> can they be used? Are they helpful if I want the UAC to be in a thread and
> UAS to be in another thread? Please don't ignore my questions coz i realy
> need the answers as soon as possible.
>
>
>
> best regards,
>
> _______________________________________________
> resiprocate-devel mailing list
> resiprocate-devel at list.sipfoundry.org
> https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.resiprocate.org/pipermail/resiprocate-devel/attachments/20060410/d748a954/attachment.htm>
More information about the resiprocate-devel
mailing list