[reSIProcate] INFO being processed using same transaction state asBYE
Alan Hawrylyshen
alan at jasomi.com
Tue Jan 17 15:05:22 CST 2006
On Jan 16, 2006, at 11.06, Scott Godin wrote:
> Good question - the RFC does seem to indicate that you should be
> checking the Send-by parameter and verifying that the Method's match -
> although it is not very clear over how mismatches should be handled.
> However currently resip only uses the tid for matching - perhaps
> one of
> the core developers has more info to share on resip's
> implementation. :
> )
I somehow missed the rest of this thread when I responded.
I think there would be a fairly easy way to 4XX this subsequent
request, but beyond that it would get very expensive (CPU or memory)
to deal with this in an accommodating fashion.
A
More information about the resiprocate-devel
mailing list