[reSIProcate] INFO being processed using same transaction state asBYE

Alan Hawrylyshen alan at jasomi.com
Tue Jan 17 15:05:22 CST 2006


On Jan 16, 2006, at 11.06, Scott Godin wrote:

> Good question - the RFC does seem to indicate that you should be
> checking the Send-by parameter and verifying that the Method's match -
> although it is not very clear over how mismatches should be handled.
> However currently resip only uses the tid for matching - perhaps  
> one of
> the core developers has more info to share on resip's  
> implementation.  :
> )


I somehow missed the rest of this thread when I responded.
I think there would be a fairly easy way to 4XX this subsequent  
request, but beyond that it would get very expensive (CPU or memory)  
to deal with this in an accommodating fashion.

A



More information about the resiprocate-devel mailing list