[reSIProcate] dum - sip stack many-to-one relation question

[Meir Elberg]

I also thought of this option, however the MessageFillterRule is not
abstract.
My concern is whether there are additional problems with this approach,
since according to Scott, it was not designed that way.

On 11/9/05, Jason Fischl <jason at counterpath.com> wrote:
>
> Yes. You can attach multiple DialogUsageManagers to a single stack by
> using the message filter rules as Micky suggests. There is an example
> of this in repro although repro is not a second instance of dum it
> does demonstrate the idea of having two TUs.
>
> On 11/9/05, Micky Kaufmann <micky at proxy.co.il> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > DUM is a TransactionUser which means it has 'setMessageFilterRuleList'
> in
> > it.
> >
> > Wasn't the stack designed to forward messages to more than one
> > TransactionUser?
> >
> > If it was designed that way is there still a reason for not overriding
> > 'setMessageFilterRuleList' to a few dum threads and still work with one
> > stack?
> >
> > If both answer are optimistic why not have a HashTable of DumThreads and
> > update MessageFilterRule to filter messages according to
> > transactionId/DialogId hash value?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> >
> >
> > From: resiprocate-devel-bounces at list.sipfoundry.org
> > [mailto:resiprocate-devel-bounces at list.sipfoundry.org] On
> > Behalf Of Scott Godin
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2005 4:34 PM
> > To: Meir Elberg; resiprocate-devel at list.sipfoundry.org
> > Subject: RE: [reSIProcate] dum - sip stack many-to-one relation question
> >
> >
> >
> > You cannot attach many DUM objects to the same stack – it was not
> designed
> > this way.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> >
> >
> > From: resiprocate-devel-bounces at list.sipfoundry.org
> > [mailto:resiprocate-devel-bounces at list.sipfoundry.org] On
> > Behalf Of Meir Elberg
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2005 4:09 AM
> > To: resiprocate-devel at list.sipfoundry.org
> > Subject: [reSIProcate] dum - sip stack many-to-one relation question
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm checking the option to attach many dum objects to one SIP stack.
> > Therefore, my first question is whether it is possible and if so, is it
> > recommended ?
> >
> > The reason for doing so is that I wish to have one listening point, i.e.
> by
> > adding one transport to a SIP stack and have many dum stacks (working as
> > UAS) using this sip stack, working in different threads in parallel.
> >
> > Another question is when a SIP request is received to the SIP stack,
> what
> > is the policy of distribution of this SIP request between the different
> dum
> > objects attached to the SIP stack ?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Elberg Meir
> > Ventego Networks
> > _______________________________________________
> > resiprocate-devel mailing list
> > resiprocate-devel at list.sipfoundry.org
> > https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
> >
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.resiprocate.org/pipermail/resiprocate-devel/attachments/20051110/0cb08fa0/attachment.htm>