[reSIProcate] Dynamic binding to interfaces and ports

[Alan Hawrylyshen]

On 27-Oct-05, at 12:01 , Matthias Moetje - TERASENS GmbH wrote:

> Jason,
>
> thanks very much for your reply.
>
>
>
>> yes. this is a good idea. it is non-trivial to implement since
>> SipMessages can have pointers to Transports. We would need to switch
>> to using TransportHandles to solve this issue. Additionally, the
>> removeTransport will need to be made thread-safe. Ideally, removing a
>> transport will happen when that Transport is no longer being used by
>> any active transactions.
>>
>
> OK. What about marking a transport as disabled instead? Would this
> be easier? The transport object could continue to exist but the
> TCP/IP binding would be removed...?
>
>

Sounds like a leak recipe. I think we can get away with reference  
counting the transports.
When it drops to zero, and a removal is requested, it is removed.

Thoughts?

A