[reSIProcate] maybe have a bug in Condition::wait()
Scott Godin
slgodin at icescape.com
Tue Oct 18 09:52:48 CDT 2005
What version are you using? This bug has already been fixed in the SVN
head. The if - should really be a while loop.
________________________________
From: resiprocate-devel-bounces at list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:resiprocate-devel-bounces at list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of
Noiile
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2005 7:15 AM
To: resiprocate-devel
Subject: [reSIProcate] maybe have a bug in Condition::wait()
resiprocate-devel, Hello
In my win32 project, I used DumThread, AbstractFifo::getNext(int ms)
will be called in DumThread.
When I run my program, Sometimes it will prompt me "Assertion failed:
mSize!=0, file AbstractFifo.cxx, line 57". I think maybe have some
problems in function Condition.wait(), because it returns true but mFifo
is empty.
So I changed some codes as follows, and it runs well.
In function:
AbstractFifo::getNext(int ms)
{
....
if (mFifo.empty())
{
bool signaled = mCondition.wait(mMutex, ms);
if (!signaled || mFifo.empty()) //Changed by NOIILE;
{
return 0;
}
}
....
}
Noiile, noiile at hotmail.com
2005-10-18
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.resiprocate.org/pipermail/resiprocate-devel/attachments/20051018/851ec2de/attachment.htm>
More information about the resiprocate-devel
mailing list