[reSIProcate] Multiple non-invite client transactions

[Jason Fischl]

On 9/6/05, Keohane, Stephen <Stephen.Keohane at scansoft.com> wrote:
>  
>  
> 
> Opps – my mistake – apparently the response to the subsequent requests has
> not been received – (what threw me off was my server does what was requested
> of it). 
> 
>   
> 
> As to the decision to only support one outstanding NICT seems to stray from
> the RFC – is this correct? 
> 

Yeah. That was intentional. We didn't want to promote this since we
don't think it is a good idea - but we did want to allow it on the
UAS.

Jason