[reSIProcate] Call for Vote: resiprocate-users

[Rodrigo Alcoberro]

> VOTE on creation of new SIP Foundry list:
> Proposed scope and charter:
> A mailing list for the discussion of using the reSIProcate SIP stack  
> and building applications using the stack, and/or DUM, the dialog  
> usage manager library. Any
> discussion not related to the development of the stack internals is  
> relevant on this
> list.
> 
> [X] Yes, I support the creation of resiprocate-users.
> [ ] No,  I DO NOT support the creation of resiprocate-users.
> [ ] Abstain. I have no opinion on this, but wish to register that
>      I am not ignoring the process.
> 
> Reason (if applicable):
> I think that it could help as topic classifier.
> Some question in the "User List" could trigger a post in the "Devel List" if there is a problem to fix or feature to add.
> 
> Regards
> Rodrigo
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From:	resiprocate-devel-bounces at list.sipfoundry.org [SMTP:resiprocate-devel-bounces at list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Alan Hawrylyshen
> Sent:	Saturday, September 03, 2005 20:37
> To:	resiprocate
> Subject:	[reSIProcate] Call for Vote: resiprocate-users
> 
> 
> In the spirit of documenting and formally soliciting opinions, please  
> respond to this thread publicly and mark your preference and add any  
> comments.  In 5 days, I will tally the votes and request a new  
> mailing list based on the results, sooner if I get an obvious  
> supportive response from a majority of respondents.
> 
> Please mark an 'X' in the '[ ]' that matches your opinion.
> 
> 
> Thanks, Alan
> 
> 
> 
> Alan Hawrylyshen
> reSIProcate Project Administrator
> http://sipfoundry.org/reSIProcate/
> a l a n a t j a s o m i d o t c o m
> 
> --------- 8< --- Cut Here -----  8< ------------------------
> VOTE on creation of new SIP Foundry list:
> Proposed scope and charter:
> A mailing list for the discussion of using the reSIProcate SIP stack  
> and building applications using the stack, and/or DUM, the dialog  
> usage manager library. Any
> discussion not related to the development of the stack internals is  
> relevant on this
> list.
> 
> [ ] Yes, I support the creation of resiprocate-users.
> [ ] No,  I DO NOT support the creation of resiprocate-users.
> [ ] Abstain. I have no opinion on this, but wish to register that
>      I am not ignoring the process.
> 
> Reason (if applicable):
> 
> 
> 
> --------- 8< --- Cut Here -----  8< ------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> resiprocate-devel mailing list
> resiprocate-devel at list.sipfoundry.org
> https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel