[reSIProcate] RE: Boost and resiprocate
    Jon Ringle 
    jon.ringle at comdial.com
       
    Fri May 27 13:13:04 CDT 2005
    
    
  
On Friday 27 May 2005 14:11, Derek MacDonald wrote:
> I would rather we lift a standard(and soon to be *the* standard) smart ptr
> that is well tested rather than using the vocal smart ptr.  Also, I don't
> think the vocal smart ptr has nice cast operators/etc.
I agree. I believe that the boost family of smart ptr have been more 
thoroughly tested with a wider set of applications that the home-grown vocal 
smart ptr.
Jon
    
    
More information about the resiprocate-devel
mailing list