[reSIProcate] RE: Boost and resiprocate

[kaiduan xie]

I think one of the resiprocate's design philosophy is
to be self-contained at the beginning (it only depends
on ARES). I still prefer to use VOVCAL's
implementation for smart pointer, I have not found any
reason why VOCAL's implementation can not be used for
this case. Scott, can you take a look at VOCAL's
implementation.

Best Regards,

kaiduan
--- Scott Godin <slgodin at icescape.com> wrote:
> 
> This might not be a bad plan.  I think there are
> differing opinions amongst
> the resip developers on this one.  If this does
> indeed become generally
> accepted at some time, then it won't take make to
> switch all references from
> the resip namespace shared pointer to the boost one.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Karl Mutch [mailto:kmutch at sonimtech.com] 
> Sent: Friday, May 27, 2005 3:31 AM
> To: slgodin at icescape.com
> Subject: Boost and resiprocate
> 
> For the longer term outlook would it not be better
> to more widely adopt
> boost
> once the May release is complete as specific
> components such as the smart
> pointers
> are up for review by the standards committee and are
> likely to pass through 
> into the standard?
> 
> Thanks
> Karl
> 
> _______________________________________________
> resiprocate-devel mailing list
> resiprocate-devel at list.sipfoundry.org
>
https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
> 

______________________________________________________________________ 
Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca