[reSIProcate] StatelessProxy performance problem
Cullen Jennings
fluffy at cisco.com
Mon May 16 11:32:11 CDT 2005
not sure what is going wrong here but it should handle way more than 3cps -
if I made a build of the repro proxy for windows, could you do any
performance testing on it and see how that goes?
On 5/16/05 4:43 AM, "Moshe Matitya" <moshe.matitya at kayote.com> wrote:
> I am running the StatelessProxy application, which is included in the
> reSIProcate distribution, on Windows XP SP2 with a Pentium 4 processor. It is
> configured to open only UDP ports. I set up a load test in which every call
> session consists of the following four messages: INVITE, 180, 200, ACK. The
> scenario is as follows:
>
> reSIProcate
> . Stateless .
> . Proxy .
> . .
> . .
> Phone Phone
> A B
> | | |
> | INVITE F1 | INVITE F1 |
> |--------------->|--------------->|
> | 180 Ringing F8 | 180 Ringing F8 |
> |<---------------|<---------------|
> | 200 OK F11 | 200 OK F11 |
> |<---------------|<---------------|
> | ACK F12 | ACK F12 |
> |--------------->|--------------->|
> | |
>
> What I've found is that the Stateless Proxy cannot handle any more than 3
> calls/sec.
>
> I presume that I'm doing something wrong, since the reSIProcate Project page
> [<http://www.sipfoundry.org/reSIProcate/>] states that reSIProcate provides
> "fast performance: > ~500 transactions per second on an Intel(TM) P4".
>
> Is the StatelessProxy application supposed to handle throughput on this scale?
> If it is, then what should I be doing to boost the performance up to the
> expected levels?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Moshe
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> resiprocate-devel mailing list
> resiprocate-devel at list.sipfoundry.org
> https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.resiprocate.org/pipermail/resiprocate-devel/attachments/20050516/a2f9c014/attachment.htm>
More information about the resiprocate-devel
mailing list