[reSIProcate] RE: dum/resip design meeting

[andrea]

First of all, I apologize for this mail... I'd send it to the list, but 
I've noit check to and cc!


david Butcher wrote:
> Hi Andrea,
> 
> A fine set of questions. There is some effort required to design the new 
> interfaces and deal with the smart pointer issues. The remainder is more or 
> less just shuffling around existing code. Very little of the DUM core should be 
> touched, so might go pretty quickly.
> 
> My hope is that we can have something testable at the end of the next design 
> meeting. 

This sounds very interesting... I'm rewriting a client based on 
resiprocate stack and porting it to DUM. I think also that more docs and 
samples will help!
thanks

Andrea

> 
> There will definitely be a big change in interface. Presumably, we will arrange 
> to maintain the old interface for some time and also produce some porting 
> recommendations.
> 
> Feel free to post this thread to the list.
> 
> thanks,
> david
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Quoting andrea <andrea at csp.it>:
> 
> 
>>Hi all,
>>
>>I've a question on this mail... it sounds very interesting but I've a 
>>question by "resiprocate user point of view"!
>>I'm spending my time studying dum interface but if I understand well, 
>>you're planning to modify it a lot!
>>when do you think it will be ready to test (and to use)?
>>thanks
> 
> 
> 
>