[reSIProcate] crossing byes in dum

[Jon Ringle]

On Thursday 28 October 2004 02:29 am, Jason Fischl wrote:
> I'm just  writing some test cases where two dum user agents hang up
> simultaneously. The current behavior is:
>
> A INVITEs B
> A and B both send BYE at same time
> A rejects BYE with 481
> B rejects BYE with 481
>
> Is this valid behavior or should one of the user agents send a 200? It
> seems to me that it is probably ok as it is.

Looks like correct behaviour to me. Both UAs have already sent BYEs and should 
have disposed of the session on thier end. When the BYE is received, the 
session refered to in the call-id doesn't exist, hence the 481 response.

Jon