< Previous by Date | Date Index | Next by Date > |
< Previous in Thread | Thread Index | Next in Thread > |
Scott and Daniel,
Thank you for the explanation! Your kind answers help me
to clear the confusion.
Tom
From: Scott Godin
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2015 2:06 PM
To: Daniel Pocock
Subject: Re: [reSIProcate-users] Why multiple ICE
implementations? nICEr - is the ICE implementation that is being used in
Firefox. Is is completely separate from anything else in
resiprocate. There are some discussions about separating this out of the
resip repository for that reason.
p2p - is a the start of a "reload" implementation and is not related to
ICE
recon - is a user agent library that hopes to support ICE someday, but it
does NOT today. Some options for the future: replacement of sipXtapi
media layer with webrtc.org code (as Daniel has
mentioned). Or... integration of nICEr into recon, or... build ICE from
scratch as part of the flow manager APIs.
Scott On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Daniel Pocock <daniel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
_______________________________________________ resiprocate-users mailing list resiprocate-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx List Archive: http://list.resiprocate.org/archive/resiprocate-users/ |