Re: [reSIProcate-users] C++11 support
On 23/02/15 11:57, Jonathan Pallant wrote:
> On 21/02/2015 20:45, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>> On 20/02/15 11:30, Jonathan Pallant wrote:
>> > Is C++11 going to be officially supported at some point?
>>
>> I wouldn't have any objection to supporting C++11 but it would be
>> useful to hear the opinions of some other developers too.
>
> Are you happy to support C++11 at the expense of C++03? By that I mean,
> do you want to replace all of the auto_ptr declarations with unique_ptr
> and shared_ptr, or just live with the (dozens of) deprecation warnings?
>
I suspect there are some people who will not want to see older C++
versions become completely unsupported.
As described in my earlier email, "support" for C++11 should probably
mean that we try to build every commit with a C++11 compiler and run the
unit tests in CI.
Can you suggest any compiler flags to specifically deal with those
deprecation warnings while still letting us see other warnings?
On a related topic, I'd also like to see us move the the stdint types at
some point and there is a branch for experimenting with that and some
previous discussion about it on the dev list but we are not quite there yet.