Re: [reSIProcate-users] resip stack vs DUM for a RLS implementation
Hi Daniel,
I think starting with the DUM framework makes the most sense. It already has a bunch of the logic you will need (DialogSet, Dialog and subscription tracking). It sounds like all of the extra's you need (saving subscription state and reconstructing dialog state) are all great enhancements to have in DUM. It makes sense that the logic required to reconstruct dialog state be implemented within dum itself, however any persistence of data (ie: DB or otherwise) should probably be handled at the application level (ie: RLS server).
It would be great (for the resip community) if you were able to implement the RLS server itself in resip's SVN repository as sever based on resip/dum in a similar manner to how repro exists in the project.
Please contact me directly if you would like to discuss SVN commit access - we can create a branch in SVN for you to do development in.
Regards,
Scott Godin