Re: [reSIProcate-users] Recon licensing

[Nauman Sulaiman <nauman762-home@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Scott

"so as far as I know you only need to contribute changes you make to it back to the public"

I am unsure though if one uses it as an LGPL static lib, does the developer need to allow users to be able to add their own version of this static lib. The only way to do this is make available all object files so they can create their own version of recon (with their sipXmedia lib) should they so wish. 

So even if no changes are done, there may still be the above issue.

Any comments welcome

Regards

--- On Mon, 23/1/12, Scott Godin <sgodin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

From: Scott Godin <sgodin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [reSIProcate-users] Recon licensing
To: nauman762-home@xxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: resiprocate-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "recon-devel" <recon-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Monday, 23 January, 2012, 20:09

The BSD license is just used for the recon source itself.  recon also uses the resip stack, which is licensed under the Vovida license (also BSD like).  However sipXmedia is LGPL as you have already pointed out.  sipXmedia is used as a library in recon - so as far as I know you only need to contribute changes you make to it back to the public.

Additional info about other licenses and projects use in resip SVN is here:  http://www.resiprocate.org/License

Regards,

Scott Godin

On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 2:51 PM, Nauman Sulaiman <nauman762-home@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi,

It is stated that recon has a BSD license. Is this just the recon library with no other components linked or the whole recon component including the sipXmedia libs.

I am thinking that the whole recon component with the sipXmedia is LGPL but please correct me if I am wrong.

Thanks

_______________________________________________
resiprocate-users mailing list
resiprocate-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List Archive: http://list.resiprocate.org/archive/resiprocate-users/