< Previous by Date Date Index Next by Date >
< Previous in Thread Thread Index  

Re: [reSIProcate-users] Help with Invites


Hi Byron,

 

Thanks for that tip, I turned on the Stack log and noticed that I kept getting the sequences below instead of an invite message.

 

DEBUG | 20110629-161820.747 |  | RESIP:TRANSPORT | 360 | AFEConnection.cxx:55 | Writing ACK sip:xxxx@xxxx:3875;transport=TCP SIP/2.0

Via: SIP/2.0/TCP xxxx:65488;branch=z9hG4bK-d8754z-f451367fdc125339-1---d8754z-;rport

Max-Forwards: 70

Route: <sip:xxxx;lr>

Contact: <sip:xxxx@xxxx:65488;transport=TCP>

To: <sip:xxxx@xxxxxxxx:5060;transport=TCP>;tag=434f4961

From: <sip:xxxx@xxxxxxxx;transport=TCP>;tag=12547b43

Call-ID: MzdmMTY2NDgzNDM2OGJmODA2ZDM2Mzg4YTk3YTMwYzU.

CSeq: 1 ACK

Content-Length: 0

 

I get the same number of these in place of invites coming in. It is always the same contact info and same call ID. The invites coming in are different from the contact from the above sip message. AFEConnection is my child  class which helps me integrate Eyeball network’s communications layer.

 

 

From: Byron Campen [mailto:bcampen@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2011 8:38 PM
To: Quanh Do
Subject: Re: [reSIProcate-users] Help with Invites

 

Is there any logging from the stack? Regardless of what DUM is doing, you should still get something in the logs if the message is arriving on a port the stack is listening on.

Best regards,

Byron Campen


On Jun 27, 2011, at 1:41 PM, Quanh Do <quanhd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Thanks for the response Scott. This isn’t the case though because I am driving the process loop. I’m sure that the loop is still running too. This works fine when I’m on the same network, but as soon as I put both of them on separate networks, they stop working.

 

Quanh

 

From: slgodin@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:slgodin@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Scott Godin
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2011 11:44 AM
To: Quanh Do
Cc: resiprocate-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [reSIProcate-users] Help with Invites

 

Sounds like you may not be driving the process loop to give DUM and stack cycles to do work: 

 

Scott

On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Quanh Do <quanhd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi,

 

For some reason my invites aren’t getting processed. I see a bunch of invites coming in from wireshark but the Callee just isn’t processing it. Here’s the scenario:

-          Both ends are on different networks

-          Caller sends an invite

-          Callee does not receive anything (shows up on wireshark though)

-          Caller gets a 408 response

I added debug messages all over the DUM to see if it is processing any of those invites but I did not see anything. I’m totally new to this message board so please let me know if you guys need any other info from me. I appreciate the guidance.

 

Thanks,

Quanh


_______________________________________________
resiprocate-users mailing list
resiprocate-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List Archive: http://list.resiprocate.org/archive/resiprocate-users/

 

_______________________________________________
resiprocate-users mailing list
resiprocate-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List Archive: http://list.resiprocate.org/archive/resiprocate-users/