< Previous by Date	Date Index	Next by Date >
< Previous in Thread	Thread Index	Next in Thread >

Re: [reSIProcate-users] DNS SRV support

From: Byron Campen <bcampen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 10:40:54 -0500

> 2. Why timeout for no response case (408) is so short. Faulty host is being tried very fast again, the transaction fails instead of going with available hosts.

[Scott] I think it configurable, but I'm not sure why this default was chosen.

I am not sure why my initial reply to this wasn't sent to Boris, but here goes again...

This is not yet configurable. Probably should go ahead and do that. But, as long as we're on the subject, what would a good default be?

Best regards,

Byron Campen

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

References:
- Re: [reSIProcate-users] Query on UA iMPLEMENTATION
  - From: Scott Godin
- [reSIProcate-users] DNS SRV support
  - From: Boris Rozinov
- Re: [reSIProcate-users] DNS SRV support
  - From: Scott Godin

Prev by Date: Re: [reSIProcate-users] TCP-connection closed when parsing fails
Next by Date: Re: [reSIProcate-users] Compatability with RFC2543 clients
Previous by thread: Re: [reSIProcate-users] DNS SRV support
Next by thread: Re: [reSIProcate-users] Query on UA iMPLEMENTATION
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread