Re: [reSIProcate-users] MessageDecorator::clone function of 1.4
Karlsson wrote:
So my code is correctly, right ?
Your code does not leak memory.
/a
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 6:20 AM, Byron Campen <bcampen@xxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:bcampen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
The caller takes ownership when it calls clone.
Best regards,
Byron Campen
The 1.4 has added a member function which named clone for
class MessageDecorator, this is a
pure virtual function and requires implement it in derivation
class.
I have been wrote this function as below:
MessageDecorator* SipMessageDecorator::clone() const
{
SipMessageDecorator * decorator = new SipMessageDecorator;
decorator->setStunResult(mStunIP, mStunPort);
return (MessageDecorator *)decorator;
}
So far with my testing it's working fine, but does there has
memeory leak with "SipMessageDecorator * decorator = new
SipMessageDecorator;" ?
Please advice, thanks.
_______________________________________________
resiprocate-users mailing list
resiprocate-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:resiprocate-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List Archive:
http://list.resiprocate.org/archive/resiprocate-users/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
resiprocate-users mailing list
resiprocate-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List Archive: http://list.resiprocate.org/archive/resiprocate-users/