< Previous by Date Date Index Next by Date >
< Previous in Thread Thread Index Next in Thread >

Re: [reSIProcate-users] Resiprocate design


I'm agree with you.


 
2008/1/31, Neil <neil.ban2008@xxxxxxxxx>:
Hi,

I had a question regarding the design of Resiprocate.

We are using the resiprocate stack in our Server product. What we
notice is that in load

scenarios of 20000+ users, the cpu usage of resiprocate goes up very
significantly.


I feel the Stackthread to be the bottleneck, since that thread is
doing a lot of operations

- handling transport(which is heavy in server products), sigcomp
processing(we are using

sigcomp) and transaction layer processing.

Do you think it'l be a good idea to have a separate transport thread
to do the transport

layers operations, and let the stack thread do the sigcomp and other
stack related

operations?

Thanks
_______________________________________________
resiprocate-users mailing list
resiprocate-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List Archive: http://list.resiprocate.org/archive/resiprocate-users/