Re: [reSIProcate] c-ares Coverity improvements

[Scott Godin <sgodin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Both c-ares and resip-ares were branched from the original ares project.  I'm not sure how similar they are at this point, but my guess is that any kind of merge would be a nightmare.  It might be better easier to run Coverity on resip-ares and make the fixes independently - not sure.

Scott

On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 8:23 AM, Daniel Pocock <daniel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

The c-ares community have been doing some Coverity scans and fixing some
potential security and stability issues in the code, it is discussed on
their mailing list:

http://c-ares.haxx.se/mail/c-ares-archive-2014-09/

It may be useful to update or merge into the reSIProcate copy of the
c-ares code to benefit from that work

https://github.com/resiprocate/resiprocate/tree/master/rutil/dns/ares
_______________________________________________
resiprocate-devel mailing list
resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://list.resiprocate.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel