reSIProcate

Mailing Lists

Source Code

Google Search:



< Previous by Date Date Index Next by Date >
< Previous in Thread Thread Index Next in Thread >

Re: [reSIProcate] dumping autotools and moving to CMake?

    I would be pretty surprised to find something like that. I do see some examples of converters from automake to cmake, although I don't know whether they actually work well.

Best regards,
Byron Campen

On 1/5/14 9:48 AM, Scott Godin wrote:
Anyone know of any good tools that could generate Visual Studio project files from autotools build configs?  It might be nice to keep autotools and have some way of autogenerating the Windows build files too.

Scott


On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 10:31 PM, Byron Campen <docfaraday@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Yes, any change like this would be an inconvenience to some. I hope that we could get an idea of how many would have a difficult time with a change like this, so if anyone falls into this category, please speak up. We are very much in a phase where we need this input.

Best regards,
Byron Campen

On Jan 4, 2014 5:47 PM, "Joegen Baclor" <jbaclor@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 01/05/2014 12:24 AM, Daniel Pocock wrote:

On 04/01/14 17:18, Byron Campen wrote:
      While I do like cmake, it is not a panacea, and there are some sharp
edges. I think it might be illustrative to try writing a cmake build for
rutil/stack (plus tests), and see how much pain we run into. I can give
this a go, since I have some experience with it.


Any feedback about it would be great, feel free to add to the wiki as well

In terms of priorities, I think that any cmake effort can probably wait
until after the 1.9.0 release has been tagged though.  Most of my own
tweaks are now committed and will appear in a beta9 tarball very soon
and it would be useful to have any final concerns/problems listed if
anybody thinks it is not suitable for release.


It is worth mentioning that some projects (like mine) has integrated resiprocate as a native submodule utilizing the capability of autotools to nest other project within a single homogeneous build. This is not a complaint but just a side note.  Whatever works best for resiprocate, I won't have trouble with.

_______________________________________________
resiprocate-devel mailing list
resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://list.resiprocate.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel