< Previous by Date | Date Index | Next by Date > |
Thread Index | Next in Thread > |
The thing is, from reading the RFC's, the cookie header is like this: Cookie: name1=value1; name2=value2 |
And you can theoretically have many headers (but in practice it's never done). |
The problem is I can't use the existing code to parse the ';' symbol, it only knows of using ',' to split multiple field-values. |
I could add some code to also treat the cookie case but it's not really "sip grammar" (neither is the cookie, but I think it's fine if it uses the existing code), so I'm not sure if it's ok or not. |
Or I could just use the Cookie header as StringCategory type, and make a separate parser just for cookies but it won't really adhere to the code style/pattern. Kind regards, Catalin |