< Previous by Date Date Index Next by Date >
< Previous in Thread Thread Index  

Re: [reSIProcate] merging b-webrtc sometime soon....


I'm good with a merge as long as goal A is met.

Scott

Sent from my iPhone

On 2013-04-02, at 5:56 PM, Daniel Pocock <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> 
> At some point I will have to merge b-webrtc into main
> 
> At a bare minimum, this will only happy if I feel that:
> 
> (a) non-WebRTC users (e.g. WSPort=0, WSSPort=0) will not suffer side effects
> 
> (b) there is some useful value (e.g. at least one fully working use case)
> 
> The original patch would let me set up a call but neither the ACK nor
> BYE would get through, I've recently resolved that and I feel that
> brings it up close to the level of (b)
> 
> If anybody thinks the threshold should be higher than that, please feel
> free to say so.  In any case, there is a higher threshold that needs to
> be met for a production release.
> 
> My rational for doing this merge sooner rather than later is that it is
> impacting some non-WebSocket code (e.g. generalizations such as the
> isSecure() method added last week) and I feel it is more productive to
> do such things on main in the hope they are widely tested before 1.9
> comes along.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> resiprocate-devel mailing list
> resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://list.resiprocate.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel