Re: [reSIProcate] merging b-webrtc sometime soon....
I'm good with a merge as long as goal A is met.
Scott
Sent from my iPhone
On 2013-04-02, at 5:56 PM, Daniel Pocock <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> At some point I will have to merge b-webrtc into main
>
> At a bare minimum, this will only happy if I feel that:
>
> (a) non-WebRTC users (e.g. WSPort=0, WSSPort=0) will not suffer side effects
>
> (b) there is some useful value (e.g. at least one fully working use case)
>
> The original patch would let me set up a call but neither the ACK nor
> BYE would get through, I've recently resolved that and I feel that
> brings it up close to the level of (b)
>
> If anybody thinks the threshold should be higher than that, please feel
> free to say so. In any case, there is a higher threshold that needs to
> be met for a production release.
>
> My rational for doing this merge sooner rather than later is that it is
> impacting some non-WebSocket code (e.g. generalizations such as the
> isSecure() method added last week) and I feel it is more productive to
> do such things on main in the hope they are widely tested before 1.9
> comes along.
>
> _______________________________________________
> resiprocate-devel mailing list
> resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://list.resiprocate.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel