Re: [reSIProcate] 439 response to REGISTER in Resip 1.8.5

[Daniel Pocock <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 23/08/12 02:31, Mike Hubbard wrote:
> It appears in Resip 1.8.5 that if a UAC sends a REGISTER with a reg-id
> parameter in the contact header and branched via, the stack responds with a
> 439, despite the REGISTER not containing a Supported header advertising
> support of the "outbound" feature.  Based on my reading of the draft
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sip-outbound-16
> <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sip-outbound-16#section-11.6>  in
> sections 6 and 11.6, it seems that this is an incorrect response.  The draft
> seems to indicate that a 439 should only be sent if the REGISTER message
> contains the reg-id parameter AND the outbound option tag.  
> 
>  
> 
> Has anyone else experienced problems with this?


Did 1.8.2 or 1.8.4 behave differently?  Is this a regression with 1.8.5?

Are you using repro or just resip/dum?