Re: [reSIProcate] moving contrib/ares to rutil/ares?
I second Adams remarks.
Scott
Sent from my iPhone
On 2012-04-26, at 5:36 PM, Adam Roach <adam@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 4/26/12 4:26 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>>
>>
>> Given that ares is not like the other stuff under contrib (because it is
>> modified), would it be better to move it under rutil/ares? Any
>> objections to this?
>>
>> This will also lead to us adding it to the main build system (e.g. from
>> autotools), although --with-c-ares will still be supported too
>
> I do not object to such a move. I would find it highly beneficial to have
> ares integrated into the build system so as to avoid having to manually build
> it before building the rest of the project.
>
> /a
> _______________________________________________
> resiprocate-devel mailing list
> resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://list.resiprocate.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel