On 2010 September 16, Thursday 10:22:05 Robert Szokovacs wrote:
> On 2010 September 15, Wednesday 18:43:18 Scott Godin wrote:
> > There is a parameter to the provisional method, called earlyFlag, that
> > specifies if you would like the SDP to be provided in the 18x response or
> > not (if you happened to provide the SDP to resip before calling this).
>
> My bad, I was sidetracked by the comments in the header and failed to
> realize there's already a solution :(
>
> Thank you for the answer!
>
> br
>
> Szo
>
> > If you are not using PRACK then any SDP send in a 18x response must also
> > be repeated in the 200 response, and it cannot be changed - this is an
> > RFC requirement.
> >
> > Scott
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 10:31 AM, Robert Szokovacs <
> >
> >
rszokovacs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > We have a B2BUA based on resiprocate and we noticed that if the "c"
> > > leg (the
> > > one we call out to) sends a 183 with SDP and then a 180 without, we
> > > pass the
> > > "a" leg (the one originated the call) the 180 with the SDP from the 183
> > > included. This is not the desired behaviour, since there are some 3rd
> > > party devices that doesn't seem to tolerate this.
> > > This happens because we call ServerInviteSession's
> > > provide[Answer|Offer]() before calling provisional() for the 183, and
> > > then calling provisional() for
> > > the 180, and have no way of telling resiprocate not to include the SDP.
> > > The problem is that according to the comments in
> > > ServerInviteSession.hxx it is not
> > > necessary:
> > > /** Called to set the offer that will be used in the next message that
> > >
> > > sends an offer. [...] */
> > >
> > > virtual void provideOffer(const SdpContents& offer);
> > >
> > > (same with provideAnswer)
> > >
> > > We interpreted it as "the next and only the next" message will include
> > > the SDP, but the code doesn't do that way. Is that the correct
> > > behaviour? If it's
> > > a bug, which way should I look for solution? Should we empty the
> > > mCurrentLocalSdp & mProposedLocalSdp after sending it? Should we
> > > transition to
> > > a state that doesn't call setSdp() in sendProvisional() (which state?)
> > >
> > > Any help is appreciated!
> > >
> > > TIA
> > >
> > > br
> > >
> > > Szo
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > resiprocate-devel mailing list
> > >
resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
https://list.resiprocate.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel