< Previous by Date	Date Index	Next by Date >
< Previous in Thread	Thread Index	Next in Thread >

Re: [reSIProcate] CANCEL without To-tag not working

From: Scott Godin <sgodin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 09:22:15 -0500

I'm not tracking any known issues with CANCEL processing. It's normal for a CANCEL message not to have a to-tag. Resip uses a CancelMap, indexed by transactionId to match an incoming cancel message to it's DialogSet. Do you have logs for your scenario?

On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 8:08 AM, Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi,
If an UAC cancels an invite without sending the To-tag, the DialogSet
will not be found and nothing happens. I think resiprocate should be
able to handle this, as provisionals are normally unreliable. Is this a
known issue?

Best Regards
Björn Andersson
_______________________________________________
resiprocate-devel mailing list
resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://list.resiprocate.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [reSIProcate] CANCEL without To-tag not working
  - From: Bjorn Andersson

References:
- [reSIProcate] CANCEL without To-tag not working
  - From: Bjorn Andersson

Prev by Date: [reSIProcate] CANCEL without To-tag not working
Next by Date: Re: [reSIProcate] Resiprocate SIP stack
Previous by thread: [reSIProcate] CANCEL without To-tag not working
Next by thread: Re: [reSIProcate] CANCEL without To-tag not working
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread