The rutil tree is used by just about every other part of resip. It is
well tested and stable.
/a
On 9/10/09 4:51 PM, neil.young wrote:
May I additionally ask for you opinion
about
the state of the 1.5 rutil path? Is it stable? Or was it also part of
the 2-3 days hack. If not, I could concentrate on P2P...
Regards
Adam Roach schrieb:
The p2p code is based on a fairly early version of the RELOAD
specification, and is incomplete. If you're interested in doing work to
bring it in line with the latest specification and/or completing the
missing components, you're on the right path.
If you're trying to use it to build an application at this point in
time, you're going to be frustrated.
/a
On 09/10/2009 02:30 PM, neil.young wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to build the p2p branch of resiprocate-1.5. I could manage
to successfully compile the files of the solution, but the link of the
testconsole failed due to missing libs, namely p2p.lib and rutil.lib.
After I added the libs, everything was fine.
Known issue?
Regards
_______________________________________________
resiprocate-devel mailing list
resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://list.resiprocate.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
_______________________________________________
resiprocate-devel mailing list
resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://list.resiprocate.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
|