Re: [reSIProcate] Question concerning resiprocate-1.5

["neil.young" <neil.young@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Scott and Adam,

thanks for your answer. I think, the p2p stuff could be a good starting point for completing the things into the RELOAD direction. Let's see, how far it goes.

Thanks

Adam Roach schrieb:

The p2p code is based on a fairly early version of the RELOAD specification, and is incomplete. If you're interested in doing work to bring it in line with the latest specification and/or completing the missing components, you're on the right path.

If you're trying to use it to build an application at this point in time, you're going to be frustrated.

/a

On 09/10/2009 02:30 PM, neil.young wrote:

Hi,

I'm trying to build the p2p branch of resiprocate-1.5. I could manage to successfully compile the files of the solution, but the link of the testconsole failed due to missing libs, namely p2p.lib and rutil.lib. After I added the libs, everything was fine.

Known issue?

Regards

 
_______________________________________________
resiprocate-devel mailing list
resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://list.resiprocate.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel