Re: [reSIProcate] Status of faststreams?
The faststreams implementation has been thoroughly tested for the stack and
DUM on Windows. It has not been widely tested with the other parts of
resip. At this point I don't think it should be enabled by default. As
more developers use it and it gets some additional testing in non-windows
environments and additional testing in all areas of resip at some point it
would be reasonable to enable by default. Enabling by default would require
some developers to make changes to support faststreams, so it would not be
an isolated change to the resip codebase.
I will take a look at the build issues (although probably not until after
the holiday). Thanks for the report.
-justin
-----Original Message-----
From: resiprocate-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:resiprocate-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Max Bowsher
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2008 6:12 AM
To: resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [reSIProcate] Status of faststreams?
Hi,
What is the status of the faststreams code in Resiprocate 1.4.1, and should
it really be enabled by default?
Whilst it does seem to work ok to build the stack, DUM, and repro, building
other parts of resiprocate source tree fails with numerous compiler errors:
- resip/stack/test/testStack.cxx
rutil Inserter doesn't work with faststream
- reTurn/**
asio::ip:address cannot be inserted into a faststream
- tfm/**
Makes numerous direct references to STL streams
Defining RESIP_USE_STL_STREAMS allows these things to build.
Max.