Re: [reSIProcate] PRACK UAS support
Thanks Jason. Is the intent to follow all of RFC3262 and follow the
offer/answer guidelines in:
http://www.tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sipping-sip-offeranswer-07, or
similar?
It would be phenomenal if the people who are familiar with what the
functionality and implementation will look like posted their thoughts on the
wiki :-). This is not only useful to gauge expectations for users of the
implementation but also to understand the scope of work for those that may
be able to help.
-justin
-----Original Message-----
From: Jason Fischl [mailto:jason@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 1:32 PM
To: Justin Matthews
Cc: resiprocate-devel
Subject: Re: [reSIProcate] PRACK UAS support
It should be doable to add support for PRACK UAS in about a week of
effort. Most of the groundwork has already been done. There are
certainly some assumptions that can be made that will simplify the
effort and I recommend that we make those.
On Apr 22, 2008, at 10:24 AM, Justin Matthews wrote:
> Ok, someone has to ask what the status is at least every 6-12 months
> J, so..
>
> Have decisions been made on exactly what functionality is going to
> be supported? I've briefly read some of the IETF discussions on the
> problems with PRACK. Does supporting a restricted set of
> requirements make sense for an initial implementation (removing some
> of the complexity, ie: disable offer/answer in a PRACK)?
>
> Thanks,
>
> -justin
> _______________________________________________
> resiprocate-devel mailing list
> resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://list.resiprocate.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel