< Previous by Date | Date Index | Next by Date > |
< Previous in Thread | Thread Index | Next in Thread > |
Sorry – I meant, DUM should not send an ACK without SDP.
Step 3 below should not be happening. Also passing null into the initialOffer argument of makeInviteSession
should not crash. Sounds like you might be using a pretty old version of
resiprocate. Scott From: Karlsson
[mailto:boost.regex@xxxxxxxxx] Thanks for your answer: I mean: 1: UAC call UAS without SDP 2: UAS replied 200 with SDP 3: UAC will be fires the onConnected and send a ACK without
SDP to UAS 4: UAC will be fires onOffer 5: use the provideAnswer to send a ACK with SDP Then UAS will received two ACKs? Another questions: I want to send a INVITE without SDP body, I using: SharedPtr<SipMessage> inviteMessage = mDum.makeInviteSession(NameAddr(callee),
profile, NULL); The program crashed. thanks 2007/12/9, Scott Godin <slgodin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>: In that case DUM should not
send an empty SDP – you
should get an onOffer callback when the 200 arrives and the ACK will be sent
after you call provideAnswer. From: resiprocate-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:resiprocate-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Karlsson When UAC call UAS with SDP, the UAS replied the 200 OK with SDP, the UAC
will be send the ACK automatically and the onConnected will be fires. But in this case: UAC call UAS without the SDP, and the UAS replied 200 OK
with SDP, UAC
need to replied the ACK with SDP. but the DUM will send the ACK without SDP automatically , then UAS will
received two ACKs?
So does there need to diable the DUM send ACK? Thanks |