Re: [reSIProcate] gperf updates? Remove some hackery.

[Byron Campen <bcampen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

	I would like to point out that generating fresh hash functions on  
every build is of limited value, especially considering the hoops you  
have to jump through to add a method/header/parameter anyway.

Best regards,
Byron Campen

> The only thing i'll point out is that this will break the build on
> lots of embedded systems. What does it really buy us?
>
> On 10/9/07, Byron Campen <bcampen@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >         I'm all for it.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Byron Campen
> >
> > > I've noticed that the newer versions of gperf permit case- 
> > > insensitive
> > > hashes to be generated. I find this oddly satisfying given that the
> > > GNU/FSF position on this previously was 'over my dead body'.
> > >
> > > What are peoples' feelings around updating our build process to
> > > leverage gperf 3.X and remove the hackery that edits the output of
> > > the hash function generators?
> > >
> > > Thoughts?
> > >
> > > Alan
> > >
> > > Alan Hawrylyshen
> > > a l a n a t p o l y p h a s e d o t c a
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > resiprocate-devel mailing list
> > > resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > https://list.resiprocate.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel