< Previous by Date | Date Index | Next by Date > |
< Previous in Thread | Thread Index | Next in Thread > |
Best regards, Byron Campen
I've applied the patch you provided, and the following is the output: ClientAuthManager::RealmState::addAuthentication user="test1" password="test1" realm="192.168.0.161" method="REGISTER" uri="sip:192.168.0.161" nonce="46fc6185e2820d8645d037bec59f942b1ecc747d" qop="" cnonce="" cnonceCount="" ClientAuthManager::RealmState::addAuthentication user="test1" password="test1" realm="192.168.0.161" method="REGISTER" uri="sip:192.168.0.161" nonce="46fc6185e2820d8645d037bec59f942b1ecc747d" qop="" cnonce="" cnonceCount="" ClientAuthManager::RealmState::addAuthentication user="test1" password="test1" realm="192.168.0.161" method="REGISTER" uri="sip:192.168.0.161" nonce="46fc6186593cb8809361b4cca006d0be0a15e5d8" qop="" cnonce="" cnonceCount="" ClientAuthManager::RealmState::addAuthentication user="test1" password="test1" realm="192.168.0.161" method="REGISTER" uri="sip:192.168.0.161" nonce="46fc6186593cb8809361b4cca006d0be0a15e5d8" qop="" cnonce="" cnonceCount="" UserAgent:;onFailure: Register 401 UserAgent:;onFailure: Register 401 Thank you and best regards, Sean. --- Byron Campen <bcampen@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:I have tried this using resip's code, and it is not giving the same result that is in the trace. I can't get resip to generate the response you're seeing with the stuff in the Authorization header. Furthermore, resip's code generates the same response as the M-CAS user agent. Can you send full DEBUG-level logging? Also, if you can, apply the attached patch to your checkout of resip (this will add a logging statement that should ensure that your configuration is what you think it is). Best regards, Byron CampenThe password is the same, that is: test1 Thanks a lot. Sean. --- Byron Campen <bcampen@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:So, about the only thing we can do at this pointisto try to figure out if it is a config problem (whitespace at theendof a password or something similar). What is the password fortest1?Best regards, Byron Campencan anyone help me on this problem? is there any problem on resiprocate'sauthenticationpart? --- Sean <yunjnz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:Thanks for your help. The following is the succeeded SIP messages transported by other UAs and the same server: REGISTER sip:192.168.0.161 SIP/2.0 Via:SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.50:5060;branch=z9hG4bKC7BF07D991From:<sip:721@xxxxxxxxxxxxx;user=phone>;tag=6E3D02005F254009004E48F4To:<sip:721@xxxxxxxxxxxxx;user=phone> Contact:<sip:192.168.0.50> Expires:3600Call-ID:1ACF86B077442073D5FE973BC1DF0CF2@xxxxxxxxxxxxCSeq:1 REGISTER Max-Forwards:70 User-Agent: M-CAS/1.0 (AD100SE 91.11; NTTEAST/NTTWEST) Content-Length:0 SIP/2.0 401 Unauthorized Via:SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.50:5060;branch=z9hG4bKC7BF07D991From:<sip:721@xxxxxxxxxxxxx;user=phone>;tag=6E3D02005F254009004E48F4To:<sip:721@xxxxxxxxxxxxx;user=phone>;tag=329cfeaa6ded039da25ff8cbb8668bd2.5e53Call-ID:1ACF86B077442073D5FE973BC1DF0CF2@xxxxxxxxxxxxCSeq:1 REGISTER WWW-Authenticate: Digest realm="192.168.0.161",nonce="46d619bf3cbdd395f431c45152d54c98d1de88ed"Server: OpenSER (1.2.2-notls (i386/linux)) Content-Length: 0 REGISTER sip:192.168.0.161 SIP/2.0 Via:SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.50:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2514E4D993From:<sip:721@xxxxxxxxxxxxx;user=phone>;tag=6E3D02005F254009004E48F4To:<sip:721@xxxxxxxxxxxxx;user=phone> Contact:<sip:192.168.0.50> Expires:3600 Authorization:Digestusername="test1",realm="192.168.0.161",nonce="46d619bf3cbdd395f431c45152d54c98d1de88ed",uri="sip:192.168.0.161",response="968582fa56dc59346550d18425adbafa"Call-ID:1ACF86B077442073D5FE973BC1DF0CF2@xxxxxxxxxxxxCSeq:2 REGISTER Max-Forwards:70 User-Agent: M-CAS/1.0 (AD100SE 91.11; NTTEAST/NTTWEST) Content-Length:0 SIP/2.0 200 OK Via:SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.50:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2514E4D993From:<sip:721@xxxxxxxxxxxxx;user=phone>;tag=6E3D02005F254009004E48F4To:<sip:721@xxxxxxxxxxxxx;user=phone>;tag=329cfeaa6ded039da25ff8cbb8668bd2.2a66Call-ID:1ACF86B077442073D5FE973BC1DF0CF2@xxxxxxxxxxxxCSeq:2 REGISTER Contact: <sip:192.168.0.50>;expires=3600 Server: OpenSER (1.2.2-notls (i386/linux)) Content-Length: 0 --- Byron Campen <bcampen@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Can you also send a trace of the other UA? Itispossible that ser is nitpicking parts of the Authorizationheader(forinstance, the uri portion does not match the From header,whichsome implementations don't like) Best regards, Byron CampenThe following is the SIP messages captured: REGISTER sip:192.168.0.161 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP192.168.0.170:5160;branch=z9hG4bK-d8754z-5579f2ea1793031c-1---d8754z-;rport Max-Forwards: 70 Contact:<sip:789@xxxxxxxxxxxxx:5160;rinstance=385a6960bf7c71df>To: <sip:789@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> From: <sip:789@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>;tag=6cf8ed5b Call-ID:NzAyMjkxYTYxOWJmZWNlZWFmYmNlYTBkZDQ0MzA1MTU.CSeq: 1 REGISTER Expires: 3600 Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE,NOTIFYUser-Agent: vosip Content-Length: 0 SIP/2.0 401 Unauthorized Via: SIP/2.0/UDP=== message truncated ===______________________________________________________________________ ______________Need a vacation? Get great deals to amazing places on Yahoo! Travel. http://travel.yahoo.com/ _______________________________________________ resiprocate-devel mailing list resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://list.resiprocate.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature