Re: [reSIProcate] RecursiveMutex for APPLE and INTEL_COMPILER

[Byron Campen <bcampen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

	After some digging, it appears that support for recursive mutexes  
was added to OS X in version 10.2. Is this sufficiently far in the  
past (last update released was 10.2.8 in Oct 2003) that we are  
comfortable with removing the defined(__APPLE__) check?

Best regards,
Byron Campen

> Why is this ifdef to not compile RecursiveMutex in the code?
>
> #if defined( __APPLE__ )  || defined (__INTEL_COMPILER)
> // !cj! need to write apple/intel mutex stuff
> namespace resip
> {
>
> RecursiveMutex::RecursiveMutex()
> {
>    //assert(0);
> }
> ...
>
>
> OSX (at least 10.4) can compile the regular implementation just
> fine---we just removed the defined(__APPLE__) and recursive mutexes
> work.  I don't know about the __INTEL_COMPILER, but why are all the
> assert(0)'s commented out?  Seems like code that tries to use this
> would want to know it's not really getting a mutex.
>
> Bruce
> _______________________________________________
> resiprocate-devel mailing list
> resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://list.resiprocate.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel