< Previous by Date | Date Index | Next by Date > |
< Previous in Thread | Thread Index | Next in Thread > |
Hmm – calling ClientInviteSession::end() will cause a BYE to
sent, and the original INVITE transaction should still be active, since the
invite was not CANCELED. I would have thought that the transaction state would
have been cleaned up after some timeout – but there may currently be a
requirement for the application to cancel the transaction completely since you
did receive a provisional response. You could try switching your call to AppDialogSet()->end() or
DialogUsageManager::end(), which should send a CANCEL instead to see if the
problem goes away. Scott From:
resiprocate-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:resiprocate-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Greg
Inglis Hi
there, I
am getting a memory leak in my application when I end my
UAC session while the session is in a 'UAC_Early' state i.e.
I've got a '180 Ringing' from the remote UAS endpoint but I haven't received a
'200 OK' as yet. I'm
getting the following statistics message from the stack afterwards: TU
summary: 0 TRANSPORT 0 TRANSACTION 0 CLIENTTX
1 SERVERTX 0 TIMERS 0 The
'CLIENTTX 1'
in the TU summary doesn't go away no matter how long I wait - I
assume this means a transaction has leaked somehow? I
am ending the session by calling ClientInviteSession::end() and
subsequently calling process() on the stack and DUM - is there some step I
am missing here? I'm
using reSiprocate 1.1 built on VC8 SP1 and my SIP proxy is asterisk. Any
help would be appreciated Greg Inglis Software Engineer Telephonetics VIP Ltd For
Technical Support / Fault Logging please use support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Emails to my
personal address will not be managed in my absence. Providing
innovative hosted and customer premises speech recognition and voice automation
solutions. Winner of
the National Business Awards (SE Region) Business Innovation of the Year 2004
& 2005 and Dacorum Business Of The Year Award 2003 & 2006. Disclaimer: |