Re: [reSIProcate] addTransport and interfaces with equal IP

[Fredrik Skoog <fs@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Ok, I need the functionality to bind to an interface, so I will try  
to implement it. Do you see any problems doing it?

Best regards,

Fredrik

27 feb 2007 kl. 15.14 skrev Byron Campen:

> 	The name of the fifth parameter of SipStack::addTransport,  
> ipInterface, is misleading. The function expects an IP-address  
> there, and not an interface-name. I will put this on my list of  
> things to fix.
>
> Best regards,
> Byron Campen
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > I'm building a system with a lot of VLAN-interfaces and most of the
> > interfaces have the same IP. When I'm doing addTransport I can
> > specify a interface-name, but it seems like it's binding to an IP
> > anyway. I was expecting a setsockopt-call with a SO_BINDTODEVICE-
> > parameter, but could not find it. Is it working anyway? or is it
> > something I have to implement? and do you see any problems
> > implementing it?
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Fredrik
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > resiprocate-devel mailing list
> > resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://list.resiprocate.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel