< Previous by Date Date Index Next by Date >
< Previous in Thread Thread Index Next in Thread >

Re: [reSIProcate] Accessing headers on a URI


Should be reasonably straight forward to extract HeadersHolder as
parent of SipMessage.
It is not enirely pretty how this interacts with TransactionMessage,
but the simplicity of single inheritance probably warrants the warts.

Note that this refactoring will make it even more difficult to figure
out how to get headers out of a SIP message, sigh.

How frequent are embedded headers?

david

On 2/16/07, Byron Campen <bcampen@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
        Oh yes, it would just be nice to be able to do this without all the
extraneous stuff in SipMessage (mDestination, mSource, mContents,
mReason, mEncoded, mCompartmentId, etc).

Best regards,
Byron Campen

> Keep in mind that it is possible to embed multiple headers into a URI.
> The current api is probably the most efficient way to get the desired
> functionality.
>
> Jason
>
>
> On 2/16/07, Will McKinley <wmckinle@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Sure thing.
>>
>>
>> On 2/16/07 11:31 AM, "Robert Sparks" <rjsparks@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> > Will -
>> >
>> > If you see a place to make clarifying nudges on the wiki to help
>> the
>> > next person that runs into this, please add them.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> > RjS
>> >
>> > On Feb 16, 2007, at 10:02 AM, Byron Campen wrote:
>> >
>> >> You'll use the usual SipMessage::header accessor. I know this is
>> >> really heavy for just holding onto a single header-field-value,
>> but
>> >> right now there is no way to conveniently extract the "I hold
>> >> header-field-values" functionality from SipMessage (as opposed to
>> >> the "I hold transport information" and "I hold a payload"
>> >> functionality).
>> >>
>> >> Best regards,
>> >> Byron Campen
>> >>
>> >>> Sorry to be a pest, but then what accessor on the SipMessage do I
>> >>> use to get
>> >>> to the hname/hvalue.  The header accessor doesn't seem
>> appropriate
>> >>> so I'm
>> >>> just wondering.
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks again.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On 2/16/07 10:53 AM, "Byron Campen" <bcampen@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> Yeah, that's how it works. Kinda heavy.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Best regards,
>> >>>> Byron Campen
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> Hi all,
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> I just need some clarification on how resip handles headers
>> on a
>> >>>>> Sip URI.  I
>> >>>>> noticed that the documentation pointed to the embedded()
>> method on
>> >>>>> the Uri
>> >>>>> class, but this returns a SipMessage.  This seems to be
>> overkill
>> >>>>> for a
>> >>>>> hname/hvalue pair.  Is this really the way it works?
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Your help is much appreciated.
>> >>>>> -Will
>> >>>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>>> resiprocate-devel mailing list
>> >>>>> resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >>>>> https://list.resiprocate.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
>> >>>>
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> resiprocate-devel mailing list
>> >> resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> https://list.resiprocate.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
>> _______________________________________________
>> resiprocate-devel mailing list
>> resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://list.resiprocate.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
>>


_______________________________________________
resiprocate-devel mailing list
resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://list.resiprocate.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel