< Previous by Date | Date Index | Next by Date > |
< Previous in Thread | Thread Index | Next in Thread > |
Best regards, Byron Campen
Sounds good. Why not put it into the main branch? (I don't know the word "arcane"..) Matthias-----Original Message----- From: Byron Campen [mailto:bcampen@xxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Montag, 12. Februar 2007 21:22 To: Matthias Moetje Cc: Rizsányi Zsolt; resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [reSIProcate] qop Parameter Parsing So, I have code in a working copy that stores both qop and qopOptions as DataParameters. While parsing from a HeaderFieldValue, Auth.cxx will check its Headers::Type when it encounters something that parsed as qop (ie; begins with "qop="); if it is either a WWWAuthenticate or ProxyAuthenticate, it will set the DataParameter::mQuoted to true, and set the parameter's type to qopOptions. Otherwise, it will set DataParameter::mQuoted to false, and the type to qop. From then on, the two parameter types are stored separately, and accessed with param(p_qop) and param(p_qopOptions). If you end up _creating_ a qop param with param(p_qop) or param (p_qopOptions), it will automatically do the right thing with regard to setting the quotedness. Using operator= (a'la auth.param(p_qop) ="auth"; or auth.param(p_qopOptions)="auth";) will also do the right thing. I am thinking that I will put this in a branch, since the current parameter-handling code is arcane, _particularly_ with regard to qop. Best regards, Byron CampenZsolt, in fact this is not a nice solution. We are using the ServerAuthManager and the kind of fix you are suggesting would need to be implemented in ServerAuthManager.cxx. Currently, we are subclassing ServerAuthmanager:: and copying the qopOptions parameter to a qop parameter (if the first exists and the latter doesn't) before calling the base class method. Same like with your solution: It's not really nice and it should really be fixed in the stack. Best regards, Matthias Moetje-----Original Message----- From: resiprocate-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx[mailto:resiprocate-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf OfRizsányi Zsolt Sent: Samstag, 27. Januar 2007 13:36 To: resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [reSIProcate] qop Parameter Parsing On Monday 22 January 2007, Byron Campen wrote:Ok, the problem here is that what we expect to follow qop= is context-sensitive; in an Authorization-type header, we expect to find a qop-value (a non-quoted token), but in an Authenticate-type header,we expect to see a qop-options (a quoted, comma delimited, sequenceof tokens). Unfortunately, there is currently no way to make the parse code context-sensitive. The API for Parameter would need to change (right now, it just looks for a quote, and if it is there,itassumes we were looking for a qop-options). Additionally, bothAuthorization-type and Authenticate-type are the same class (Auth),so it is doubtful that this context info is even availabe in the first place. Any opinions on how we can make this code context- sensitive with minimal impact on the rest of the code?We have encountered this issue and we have fixed it simply from the stack using code which knows its context. Here is an example: if (auth.exists(resip::p_qop)) qop = auth.param(resip::p_qop).c_str(); else if (auth.exists(resip::p_qopOptions)) qop = auth.param(resip::p_qopOptions).c_str(); else qop = ""; It's probably not the nicest solution but I it can be implemented easily and it can be used until a better solution is found. Regards, Zsolt _______________________________________________ resiprocate-devel mailing list resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://list.resiprocate.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel_______________________________________________ resiprocate-devel mailing list resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://list.resiprocate.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature