< Previous by Date Date Index Next by Date >
< Previous in Thread Thread Index Next in Thread >

Re: [reSIProcate] Bug in SdpContents encode method


Thanks Dave.  I believe we are in the process of setting up some bug
tracking software, since our move from SipFoundry.  In the meantime
sending email to this list is a good way (even when bug tracking
software is setup).  

I will commit this fix.  Thanks again.

Scott

> -----Original Message-----
> From: resiprocate-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:resiprocate-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> Dave Mak
> Sent: Friday, February 09, 2007 4:31 PM
> To: resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: dmak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [reSIProcate] Bug in SdpContents encode method
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I am new to this mailing list and wanted to know how do I submit
> bugfixes for
> resiprocate-6627?
> 
> There is a bug in SdpContents::Session::encode() method. There is a
> missing "u=" for
> SDP with the "URI of description" item defined in RFC2327.
> 
> The fix is trivial:
> 
>     if (!mUri.host().empty())
>     {
> +      s << "u=";
>        mUri.encode(s);
>        s << Symbols::CRLF;
>     }
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> --
> Dave Mak
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> resiprocate-devel mailing list
> resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://list.resiprocate.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel