Re: [reSIProcate] Bug in SdpContents encode method
Thanks Dave. I believe we are in the process of setting up some bug
tracking software, since our move from SipFoundry. In the meantime
sending email to this list is a good way (even when bug tracking
software is setup).
I will commit this fix. Thanks again.
Scott
> -----Original Message-----
> From: resiprocate-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:resiprocate-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> Dave Mak
> Sent: Friday, February 09, 2007 4:31 PM
> To: resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: dmak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [reSIProcate] Bug in SdpContents encode method
>
> Hello,
>
> I am new to this mailing list and wanted to know how do I submit
> bugfixes for
> resiprocate-6627?
>
> There is a bug in SdpContents::Session::encode() method. There is a
> missing "u=" for
> SDP with the "URI of description" item defined in RFC2327.
>
> The fix is trivial:
>
> if (!mUri.host().empty())
> {
> + s << "u=";
> mUri.encode(s);
> s << Symbols::CRLF;
> }
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> Dave Mak
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> resiprocate-devel mailing list
> resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://list.resiprocate.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel