Re: [reSIProcate] [PATCH] reSUBSCRIBE will fail if the server fails to send NOTIFY
I can just hear the incoming missile from Tekelec.
On 1/23/07, Adam Roach <adam@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Jason Fischl wrote:
> I thought that we had discussed the correct behavior if a 2XX to the
> SUBSCRIBE is received with no corresponding NOTIFY and decided that
> the watcher should terminate the subscription in this case.
And that is precisely what 3265bis *will* specify, as long as I am still
alive.
> I realize this won't interop well with ser. Any comments?
I think I'll phrase my comment as "non-compliant implementations harm
interoperability."
It's not like 3265 is ambiguous on this point. SER simply did things
willfully wrong.
/a