Re: [reSIProcate] DUM challenging ACKs

[Byron Campen <bcampen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

	Grab the tarball for the 1.0 release if you want something official.  
http://www.sipfoundry.org/pub/reSIProcate/releases/

Best regards,
Byron Campen

> Parag wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > DUM challenging ACKs, is any fix for this issue in latest lode?
> I'm pretty sure the later versions don't have this problem - can you
> please try the version from SVN?
>
> However, if you submit an ACK with credentials, the credentials  
> must be
> valid.  If no credentials are present in the packet, then it shouldn't
> be challenged.
>
> > - Currently I have added checks in ServerAuthManager::handle()
> >
> >  //InfoLog( << "trying to do auth" );
> >   if (sipMsg.isRequest() &&
> >       sipMsg.header(h_RequestLine).method() != ACK &&
> >       sipMsg.header(h_RequestLine).method() != CANCEL)
> >   {
> >         //
> >   }
> > Is it ok...? or required more efforts?
> >
> > - I am using reSIProcate.9.0-5019.
> >
> > Thanks in advance.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Parag Patel
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > resiprocate-devel mailing list
> > resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
> _______________________________________________
> resiprocate-devel mailing list
> resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature