Re: [reSIProcate] [spam] assert when SDP answer in ACK
- From: "maodonghu" <hhmmdd@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 12:58:34 +0800
Hi
sorry, that is my mistake, but I have another question
if the SDP answer is in ACK, why only onConnected called, no onConnectedConfirm?
>resip
>
>SDP answer received
>
>ACK sip:8001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx:38004 SIP/2.0
>Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.101.11:5060;branch=z9hG4bK5bffa7a7
>Max-Forwards: 70
>To: <sip:8001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;tag=594f1d17
>From: "SIP
>Phone1"<sip:2201@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;tag=2467243b-3932-431a-bb15-6ebe81e7af92-33462134
>Call-ID: 61084f80-4ff1bae4-39-b65a8c0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>CSeq: 101 ACK
>Content-Type: application/sdp
>Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2006 06:23:32 GMT
>Allow-Events: presence
>Content-Length: 216
>
>v=0
>o=CiscoSystemsCCM-SIP 2000 1 IN IP4 192.168.101.11
>s=SIP Call
>c=IN IP4 192.168.101.32
>t=0 0
>m=audio 37166 RTP/AVP 0 101
>a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000
>a=ptime:20
>a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000
>a=fmtp:101 0-15
>}
>Assertion failed: !isRequest(), file .\SipMessage.cxx, line 1172
>
>
> maodonghu
> hhmmdd@xxxxxxx
> 2006-09-07
>
>_______________________________________________
>resiprocate-devel mailing list
>resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
maodonghu
hhmmdd@xxxxxxx
2006-09-07