Re: [reSIProcate] Calling all devels: Getting release notes ready, other release work.

["Matthias Moetje - TERASENS GmbH" <moetje@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Byron,

thanks for pushing for the 1.0 release!

Here's the tiny list of my contributions:

New Features

- STUN client support (in UdpTransport class)
- Added capability for adding a MessageDecorator through a dum profile


Fixes and minor changes

- made codec comparison case insensitive (findFirstMatchingCodec function)
- modified stunTest to use nonblocking socket and selectable timeout
- Added some missing closesocket calls to the rutil\STUN functions
- removed the static "done" check in Security::Initialize(), it caused a bug 
when the object was instantiated a second time
- Corrected the Codec constructor for telephone-event and frf-dialed-event 
constants. A payload type of 8000 was used. (Not wrong but usually 101 is used. 
8000 rather is the bandwidth)
- Added two more codec constants. (G723 and GSM)
- removed the bogus sleep stuff from stunSendTest


Best regards,

Matthias Moetje
______________________________________________

TERASENS GmbH       Phone:  +49.89.143370-0
Augustenstraße 24   Fax:    +49.89.143370-22
80333 Munich        e-mail: info@xxxxxxxxxxxx
GERMANY             Web:    www.terasens.com
______________________________________________ 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: resiprocate-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:resiprocate-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
> Byron Campen
> Sent: Monday, August 21, 2006 5:00 PM
> To: resiprocate-devel
> Subject: [reSIProcate] Calling all devels: Getting release notes 
> ready,other release work.
> 
>       I think that the easiest way to get thorough/accurate release notes 
> out rapidly is have everyone go through their commits since the last 
> release, and summarize what they have done. Everyone who is willing to 
> devote some time to doing this, please reply within the next two days. 
> If anyone wants to pick up for additional developers, let me know who. 
> I will probably be the one who goes through the remainder, so please 
> help out if you have time. I would like to shoot for having this done 
> before Friday.
> 
>       We have additional issues to discuss, such as:
> -Do we want to have any sort of documentation push?
> -Naming-scheme for this release (and following releases) -Scheduling 
> the final 1.0 release (two weeks from now?) -Anything else anyone can 
> think of (recall that I have never done this sort of thing before; 
> _please_ chime in!)
> 
> Best regards,
> Byron Campen
> 
>